Friday, April 9, 2010

Thesis


If you are interested in learning about the culture of Iran
If you are interested in Rumi's poetry
If you are interested in spirit

Don't miss this 10-minute performance!

I invite you to join me at my defense session on April 27 8:00 PM at the School of Architecture in Cambridge, 3rd floor, ARCH 3003 loft.

Appetizers and refreshments will be served.

7 Melville Street South
Cambridge, Ontario
N1S 2H4





Abstract

Inspired by the mysticism of Iran, this thesis can be thought of as the unfolding of a story: a story of me, you, and every other human being, each living at different stages of the plot.

This is the story of a lover, one who has been separated from his beloved; one who spends his entire life seeking his love. He climbs mountains, traverses deserts, and survives thunderstorms; nothing turns him from his chosen path. Through all his trials, he sustains the hope that he will genuinely perceive his lost love; gradually, he withdraws from everything except his longing for the beloved and chooses to dance and cry and chant and pray until he has drowned in desire for union with his love.

In our modern world, a significant number of traditional values have been dramatically manipulated, taking on new meanings and definitions quite different from their original or natural significance. Ideas such as selflessness, humility, and longing, among others, have seemingly lost value as a consequence of the frantic pace of modern life and replaced by self-centredness, greed, aridity, exteriority, which will have a direct impact on our surrounding environment. Let’s imagine a land in which selfishness is not a priority. Instead, replace it with a society driven by humane preferences. Would the architecture of that society still look like ours does today? Would it be as unsociable as it is in our so-called advanced civilization?

This thesis investigates this query through a juxtaposition of the traditional values of a Persian art with the demands of modern life. It is a study of the calligraphic art of Iran as a transcendental practice, highly intertwined with strong emotions. The thesis asserts that the lack of a lasting impression made by contemporary architecture is a consequence of self interest in modern life, which has led to a distorted definition of the beloved; this distorted view is a direction in which we have been moving for some time, and in which we continue to move.

This research aims to allow the essence of Persian calligraphy into modern space as a means to revive the true essence of architecture: reunion of feeling and space, a concept that is given too little attention in our current architecture.



17 comments:

  1. اردوان جان، من یه کم راهم دوره، ولی خیلی جالب به نظر میاد. امیدوارم استرس نداشته باشی و راحت و قشنگ دفاع کنی
    :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. موفق باشی اردوان....ایده کارتو خیلی دوست دارم

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your kind message TENG. I really wish you could make it.
    Good luck with the thesis. Maybe I could come to your defense if there is a performance or something!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good Luck Ardavan jan,

    Ali Kamran

    ReplyDelete
  5. good luck in advance.
    you gonna do just perfect :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. sounds incredible! you have come a long way from M1. i hope you have a great defense experience. all the best... - erica

    ReplyDelete
  7. ardavan e aziz:
    in mokhtasar ro khondam o kolli lazzat bordam.
    aykash onja boodam. miboosamet azizam.
    vaghean ke khasta nabashi....

    ReplyDelete
  8. ardavan e aziz:
    in mokhtasar ro khondam o kolli lazzat bordam.
    aykash onja boodam. miboosamet azizam.
    vaghean ke khasta nabashi....

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ardavan:
    garche nemitoonam defencet baasham, vali khosh-haalam ke injaa abstracteto khoondam. kheili lezzat bordam; az zaavieye ghashangi rafti jolo. keif kardam. damet garm! Motma'ennam aali defaa mikoni ... pisha pish tabrik!

    ReplyDelete
  10. آرمان جان، باز که زدی کانال دو برادر!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ardavan:
    khosh-haalam ke toonestam injaa abstracteto bekhoonam. kheili lezzat bordam. az zaavieye ghashangi rafti jolo. keif kardam. damet gram! pishaa pish tabrik!

    ReplyDelete
  12. shoma mage reshtat memari nis? Az ruye konjkavi miporsam, chetori rabtesh dadi be theater? Age title daghighesho begi khodam peydash mikonam.
    Mamnun

    ReplyDelete
  13. سرگرد! داستان کانال دو چیه؟ طنز سنگینه برادر..سر در نیاوردم

    ReplyDelete
  14. dear anonymous

    تأتر هنریست متکی‌ بر متن و دیالوگ. در صورتی‌ که در کار من که بهش میگن اجرا و یا
    performance
    حتا یک کلمه هم ردو بدل نمی‌شه. ارتباط صرفا از طریق فضا هست و نور و سایه و حرکت. اما با این توضیح همچنان سوال به جاییست اگر بپرسی‌ رابطه معماری با اجرا چیست. در جواب باید بگم که من معتقد هستم که معماری نه در "در بر گیرنده" "تعریف میشود و نه در "در بر گرفته شده
    (container & contained).
    بلکه معتقدم معماری به آنچیزی اطلاق میشود(باید بشود) که بر هم کنش این دوست. معماری آن فضای میانی تغییر پذیری است که بین پوسته‌ی بنا و پوسته‌ی مخاطب قرار دارد. معماری عبارت است از تغییر مداوم و نه سکون. با این توضیح خیلی‌ خیلی‌ مختصر تلاش می‌کنم که بهت بگم اجرای
    من اشاره داره به این گفتگوی دو طرفه بین بنا و مخاطب. و از طرفی‌ دیگر تاکید داره به زمان مندی معماری، و یا به کلامی‌ دیگر، به "داستان گونه" بودن معماری. شاید بد نباشه گفتن اینکه این اثر ۱۰ دقیقه یی، زاده شده از یک تحقیق ۳۰،۰۰۰ کلمه‌ای در معماری هست که به عنوان کتاب پایان نامه همراه این اثر ارائه شده.

    اسم پایان نامه هست
    "desire of union"
    . به زودی میتونی در کتابخونهٔ آنلاین دانشگاهم پیداش کنی‌.

    امیدوارم جواب کافی‌ باشه.

    ReplyDelete
  15. من همون ناشناس قبلیم
    خیلی توضیح خوبی بود...شخصا تا حالا این جوری به معماری نگاه نکرده بودم...

    پ.ن. گرچه یه مقدار باید تلاش کنم تا بفهمم دقیقا منظورت چی بوده یعنی به عبارت دیگه چند تا سوال عامیانه برام پیش اومد:
    1- اگه معماری چطوری بود نتیجه میگرفتی که دربرگیرنده است؟
    2- اگه چطوری باشه نتیجه میگری که برگرفته شده است؟

    پ.ن.پ.ن. میگم حیفه این همه تایپ کنی و اطلاعات بدی تو کامنت بیاد...
    خواستی پستش کن همه استفاده کنن
    :D:D

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi again,
    I think I wasn't able to convey what I wanted to. Sorry for the confusion.
    Here is what I meant:
    Some say architecture is about the "container" while some other say architecture is about what is being "contained" which is literally the user of architectural space. I was trying to say more than being about this one or the other it is about the interaction of both: How they influence one another!
    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  17. سلام
    امیدوارم تو ارائه تزتون موفق باشین

    ReplyDelete